Re: Inertial-dampening systems
msadkins04_at_yahoo.com
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: George Dishman: "Re: L4/L5 Space Radiation 6^4 Sv/y, 6^3 Sv/y solar minimum, Venus L2?"
- In reply to: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Feb 2005 14:40:08 -0800
Adkins:
> > > > More interestingly, what do you mean by "low frequency"
> > > > in the current application? A static magnetic field of > > > >
some particular strength is increased in strength.
> > > > What is the "frequency" of a change in field strength
> > > > that occurs only once?
<snip>
Nieminen:
>
> As I wrote in the portion you cut, there is no single
> frequency; there is a frequency spectrum. The Fourier
> transform of B(t) gives you the spectrum.
<snip>
You have merely removed the problem of definition one step, and in the
process multiplied it. A "frequency spectrum" implies a multiplicity
of frequencies, but you have yet to define "frequency" in a manner
consistent with a single occurrence. And what if your "characteristic"
feature does not emerge?
<obfuscatory nonsense snipped>
I found your reply to my puzzle non-responsive and obfuscatory.
.
Mark Adkins
msadkins04@yahoo.com
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: George Dishman: "Re: L4/L5 Space Radiation 6^4 Sv/y, 6^3 Sv/y solar minimum, Venus L2?"
- In reply to: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
