Re: Beethoven's 5th Symphony
From: John C. Polasek (jpolasek_at_cfl.rr.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: fellow: "Some questions on rigid modies in Landau's Mechanics book"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Beethoven's 5th Symphony"
- Next in thread: Richard Schultz: "Re: Beethoven's 5th Symphony"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:50:49 -0500
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:33:50 -0800, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
wrote:
>"Peter H.M. Brooks" wrote:
>>
>> Uncle Al wrote:
>> > "Peter H.M. Brooks" wrote:
>> >
>> >>I'm working on a little personal project. I'd like to get a better
>> >>understanding of Beethoven's 5th Symphony.
>> >
>> > [snip]
SNIP
If you, sir, upon hearing a definitive reading of Beethoven's 5th
Symphony, do not break down into loud, uncontrollable sobs at the
magnificence of his genius, then perhaps you may be ready to do the
same for the sunshine-laden phase of the fourth movement of Brahm's
1st Symphony, but, OK, lacking that, you are apparently ready for the
study phase.
But study first how to be over-whelmed. It's essential. Of course, you
can't get "a better understanding of Beethoven's 5th Symphony" by
studying Beethoven's 5th Symphony. Study all you want, but if you
haven't gone through the grateful sobbing phase, it's all academic,
but you'll still probably get a good grade.
Mr. Dual Space
If you have something to say, write an equation.
If you have nothing to say, write an essay
- Next message: fellow: "Some questions on rigid modies in Landau's Mechanics book"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Beethoven's 5th Symphony"
- Next in thread: Richard Schultz: "Re: Beethoven's 5th Symphony"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
