Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations
From: Felix Rawlings (fraw_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- In reply to: Perspicacious: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:36:52 GMT
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:21 -0800, Perspicacious wrote:
>> one dynamic, proof-toting mathematician has boldly
>> and confidently declared that Einstein's postulates
>> for special relativity are obsolete.
>
> "obsolete: No longer in use"
>
> Understand that great visionaries sometimes speak of the
> future as if the future were already here.
>
> http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
Are you for real? You use the language in a most amusing way.
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- In reply to: Perspicacious: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading