Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:45:55 GMT
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:03:37 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Lester Zick wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, Albert, empiricism doesn't yield truth. It only yields
>> falsity.
>
>That is true. There is no way of proving a scientific theory is true,
>always and forever, but one can falsify it.
What is your evidence for this, Bob. Give me an example that proves
this conclusion is true.
> There is also something else
>that empiricism provides: technology. Pure non-empirical philsophy is
>useless and worse than useless. It is also a waste of our finite and
>precious time.
It's certainly a waste of your rather limited intellect, Bob.
Empiricism doesn't provide technology: people provide technology
despite suffering from empiricist blinders. They succeed despite
empiricism and not because of it, utilitarian pretenses to the
contrary notwithstanding.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|