Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations
From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 02/15/05
- Next message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Previous message: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: Question about falling bodies"
- In reply to: Felix Rawlings: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Next in thread: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:20:06 GMT
"Felix Rawlings" <fraw@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.14.23.36.50.948981@yahoo.com...
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:16:21 -0800, Perspicacious wrote:
>
> >> one dynamic, proof-toting mathematician has boldly
> >> and confidently declared that Einstein's postulates
> >> for special relativity are obsolete.
> >
> > "obsolete: No longer in use"
> >
> > Understand that great visionaries sometimes speak of the
> > future as if the future were already here.
> >
> > http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
>
> Are you for real? You use the language in a most amusing way.
Eugene is a well known crank - and yes he is for real - and obviously at
least a bit sick as well.
Thanks
Bill
- Next message: Timo Nieminen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Previous message: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: Question about falling bodies"
- In reply to: Felix Rawlings: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Next in thread: Lady Chatterly: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]