Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations
From: Lady Chatterly (not-bot_at_catcher.in.the.rye)
Date: 02/15/05
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Heating an Aluminum Rod"
- In reply to: Perspicacious: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 1:50:30 GMT
In article <1108422981.402687.214810@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Perspicacious <iperspicacious@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> one dynamic, proof-toting mathematician has boldly
>> and confidently declared that Einstein's postulates
>> for special relativity are obsolete.
>
>"obsolete: No longer in use"
It is a good thing is that the 'mushroom clouds over us cities ' were
a fantasy of the internet.
>Understand that great visionaries sometimes speak of the
>future as if the future were already here.
We do not have to go to the bone.
-- Lady Chatterly "It's Mark Twain and you're replying to a bot." -- Reverend Mosnar©
- Next message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Heating an Aluminum Rod"
- In reply to: Perspicacious: "Re: Diverging Opinions on Physics Foundations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]