Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT
From: Daryl McCullough (stevendaryl3016_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/15/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: shevek4_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection""
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Feb 2005 08:05:22 -0800
Androcles says...
>You snipped
>
>"So in the ground frame, then, the B frame is moving at v/2
>and the G frame is moving at -v/2. That IS good news. Perhaps
>we can now cease being concerned about A and B being points
>in space in some god-forsaken rest frame."
That's because it is false. It is true for Galilean
relativity, but not Special Relativity.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: shevek4_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection""
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Androcles asks for Derivation of LT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|