A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke
From: edddy (ralphpoiu_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/16/05
- Next message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: edddy: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Reply: edddy: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Reply: John Zinni: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Feb 2005 17:32:15 -0800
*********************** astericks mean steel
*********************** heavy inertial containment
*********************** slabs
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
x xxxxxxx x
x x xxxxx x x
x x xxxxx x x
x x xxxxx x x
x x xxxxx x x
x x xxxxx x x
x x xxxxx x x
xx xxxxx xx
x xxxxx x
***********************
***********************
***********************
This is a crossection of the center rod surrounded by
an inverted cone of uranium. And two slabs of steel
confine the mass inertially.
It is to be a cylinder of explosives also to
compress the cone to the center rod.
IT is easier to compress than a sphere.
And is good practice in explosive technology
development.
A layer of Poloium and berylium can be added to
self form the trigger neutron pulse.
- Next message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Next in thread: edddy: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Reply: edddy: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Reply: John Zinni: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: A Practice Geometry- mini-nuke"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|