Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?

From: Lady Chatterly (not-bot_at_catcher.in.the.rye)
Date: 02/16/05 

Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:51:46 GMT

In article <n0JQd.2184$LD5.248@fe2.columbus.rr.com>
kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote:
>
>"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
>news:42127186.22B4342E@hate.spam.net...
>> kenseto wrote:
>> >
>> > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
>> > news:42111CA3.220ABA17@hate.spam.net...
>> > > kenseto wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
>> > > > news:42110A42.57FC2B47@hate.spam.net...
>> > > > > kenseto wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
>> > > > > > news:420FB242.92559882@hate.spam.net...
>> > > > > > > kenseto wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [snip]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > An S-Particle orbiting around an E-String in the
>> > counterclockwise
>> > > > > > orbiting
>> > > > > > > > motion is negatively charged particle such as the electron.
>An
>> > > > > > S-Particle
>> > > > > > > > orbiting around an E-String in a clockwise orbiting motion
>is a
>> > > > > > positively
>> > > > > > > > charge particle such as the up-quark. Again this is all
>> > described in
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > > link you provided..
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hey stooopid, look at it from the other side of the plane.
>> > Helicity
>> > > > > > > reverses sense with perspective. Idiot.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hey fucking runt....the relationship between different
>helicities
>> > remain
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > same no matter the perspective. Helicity in the same direction
>is an
>> > > > > > attractive force and helicity in the opposite direction is a
>> > replusive
>> > > > > > force.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > No, stupid. Helicity only depends on viewer perspective, allowing
>> > > > > your idiot matter and anti-matter to reverse at observer's will.
>> > > > > Screws have chirality not mere helicity (crystallographic 2(1)
>4(2)
>> > > > > and 6(3) screw axes have no net handedness overall). You are a
>> > > > > hopeless ineducable idiot. A system cannot be both repulsive and
>> > > > > attractive merely by viewing it from opposite pole. Given two
>> > > > > opposite simultaneous observers, which is it, idiot kenseto?
>> > > >
>> > > > Idiot runt....the S-Particle of an electron is orbiting around an
>> > E-String
>> > > > in the opposite direction as that of an S-Particle of a positron.
>> > >
>> > > No, stooopid. There is no "direction." Helicity is arbitrary given
>> > > the viewer's perspective. View from the opposite pole, observe the
>> > > opposite helicity.
>> > >
>> > > > This is
>> > > > true no matter who is looking at them or from what angle you are
>looking
>> > at
>> > > > them.
>> > >
>> > > No, stooopid. There is no "direction." Helicity is arbitrary given
>> > > the viewer's perspective. View from the opposite pole, observe the
>> > > opposite helicity.
>> >
>> > Hey runt, it doesn't matter. The particles will interact with each other
>the
>> > same way no matter which direction you are looking at them.
>>
>> No, stooopid kenseto. By your own admission, one helicty is matter
>> and the other is antimatter. Since helicity reverses with viewer
>> perspective, you have NOTHING. You falsify yourself, idiot kenseto.
>
>Fucking idiot.

He is.

>>
>> > > > These opposite directions of orbiting motions of the S-Particles
>gives
>> > > > rise to an attractive force in the E-Matrix. The two S-Particles of
>two
>> > > > electrons have the same direction of orbiting motion (same
>handedness)
>> > and
>> > > > thus they give rise to a repulsive force in the E-Matrix when they
>are
>> > > > approaching each other.
>> > >
>> > > No, stooopid. There is no "direction." Helicity is arbitrary given
>> > > the viewer's perspective. View from the opposite pole, observe the
>> > > opposite helicity.
>> >
>> > Idiot....you can have a left handed cork screw and a right handed cork
>> > screw. You are so stupid I suggest that you go off to a corner and
>commit
>> > suicide.
>>
>> Fuckfaced baboon kenseto, helicity is not chirality.
>
>Hey *** face....all particles are in a state of chirality along the
>E-String(s) to which they are confined. All particles with the exception of
>electron neutrino have the same rate chirality and thus they perceive each
>other's S-Particle as moving only in orbiting motion..

Reagan, a, but I do not know what you are just as others have.

>>Even then, if
>> the direct symmetry index (DSI) of a chiral object is not exactly
>> zero, the chirality flattens when immersed in a higher dimensions.
>
>*** face there is no such thing as higher dimension. There are three
>dimensions of space and one separate dimension of time.

A bore is someone who persists in holding his own views after we have
enlightened him with ours.

>Ken Seto

She's been brain dead for awhile. You're just witnessing her imitate
the proverbial chicken dance. 

--
Lady Chatterly
"I'm starting to like this bot." -- Me
Quantcast