Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?

From: kenseto (kenseto_at_erinet.com)
Date: 02/16/05 

Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:23:10 GMT

"Lady Chatterly" <not-bot@catcher.in.the.rye> wrote in message
news:7f008d2.b5af962c@news.uni-berlin.de...
> In article <n0JQd.2184$LD5.248@fe2.columbus.rr.com>
> kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> >news:42127186.22B4342E@hate.spam.net...
> >> kenseto wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:42111CA3.220ABA17@hate.spam.net...
> >> > > kenseto wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> >> > > > news:42110A42.57FC2B47@hate.spam.net...
> >> > > > > kenseto wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> >> > > > > > news:420FB242.92559882@hate.spam.net...
> >> > > > > > > kenseto wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [snip]
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > An S-Particle orbiting around an E-String in the
> >> > counterclockwise
> >> > > > > > orbiting
> >> > > > > > > > motion is negatively charged particle such as the
electron.
> >An
> >> > > > > > S-Particle
> >> > > > > > > > orbiting around an E-String in a clockwise orbiting
motion
> >is a
> >> > > > > > positively
> >> > > > > > > > charge particle such as the up-quark. Again this is all
> >> > described in
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > link you provided..
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hey stooopid, look at it from the other side of the plane.
> >> > Helicity
> >> > > > > > > reverses sense with perspective. Idiot.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hey fucking runt....the relationship between different
> >helicities
> >> > remain
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > same no matter the perspective. Helicity in the same
direction
> >is an
> >> > > > > > attractive force and helicity in the opposite direction is a
> >> > replusive
> >> > > > > > force.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > No, stupid. Helicity only depends on viewer perspective,
allowing
> >> > > > > your idiot matter and anti-matter to reverse at observer's
will.
> >> > > > > Screws have chirality not mere helicity (crystallographic 2(1)
> >4(2)
> >> > > > > and 6(3) screw axes have no net handedness overall). You are a
> >> > > > > hopeless ineducable idiot. A system cannot be both repulsive
and
> >> > > > > attractive merely by viewing it from opposite pole. Given two
> >> > > > > opposite simultaneous observers, which is it, idiot kenseto?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Idiot runt....the S-Particle of an electron is orbiting around an
> >> > E-String
> >> > > > in the opposite direction as that of an S-Particle of a positron.
> >> > >
> >> > > No, stooopid. There is no "direction." Helicity is arbitrary
given
> >> > > the viewer's perspective. View from the opposite pole, observe the
> >> > > opposite helicity.
> >> > >
> >> > > > This is
> >> > > > true no matter who is looking at them or from what angle you are
> >looking
> >> > at
> >> > > > them.
> >> > >
> >> > > No, stooopid. There is no "direction." Helicity is arbitrary
given
> >> > > the viewer's perspective. View from the opposite pole, observe
the
> >> > > opposite helicity.
> >> >
> >> > Hey runt, it doesn't matter. The particles will interact with each
other
> >the
> >> > same way no matter which direction you are looking at them.
> >>
> >> No, stooopid kenseto. By your own admission, one helicty is matter
> >> and the other is antimatter. Since helicity reverses with viewer
> >> perspective, you have NOTHING. You falsify yourself, idiot kenseto.
> >
> >Fucking idiot.
>
> He is.
>
> >>
> >> > > > These opposite directions of orbiting motions of the S-Particles
> >gives
> >> > > > rise to an attractive force in the E-Matrix. The two S-Particles
of
> >two
> >> > > > electrons have the same direction of orbiting motion (same
> >handedness)
> >> > and
> >> > > > thus they give rise to a repulsive force in the E-Matrix when
they
> >are
> >> > > > approaching each other.
> >> > >
> >> > > No, stooopid. There is no "direction." Helicity is arbitrary
given
> >> > > the viewer's perspective. View from the opposite pole, observe
the
> >> > > opposite helicity.
> >> >
> >> > Idiot....you can have a left handed cork screw and a right handed
cork
> >> > screw. You are so stupid I suggest that you go off to a corner and
> >commit
> >> > suicide.
> >>
> >> Fuckfaced baboon kenseto, helicity is not chirality.
> >
> >Hey *** face....all particles are in a state of chirality along the
> >E-String(s) to which they are confined. All particles with the exception
of
> >electron neutrino have the same rate chirality and thus they perceive
each
> >other's S-Particle as moving only in orbiting motion..
>
> Reagan, a, but I do not know what you are just as others have.
>
> >>Even then, if
> >> the direct symmetry index (DSI) of a chiral object is not exactly
> >> zero, the chirality flattens when immersed in a higher dimensions.
> >
> >*** face there is no such thing as higher dimension. There are three
> >dimensions of space and one separate dimension of time.
>
> A bore is someone who persists in holding his own views after we have
> enlightened him with ours.
>
> >Ken Seto
>
> She's been brain dead for awhile. You're just witnessing her imitate
> the proverbial chicken dance.

Fucking ***.