Re: peak oil revisited
From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 02/16/05
- Next message: Prai Jei: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- In reply to: doog: "Re: peak oil revisited"
- Next in thread: Gordon: "Re: peak oil revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:32:10 -0700
Dear doog:
"doog" <doog@toz.it.na> wrote in message news:4213B581.2070502@toz.it.na...
...
> Defending the indefensible is a lesson in educated idiocy.
Then kiss your *** goodbye. Capitalism has allowed the surface of the
Earth to be over-populated, more than it can support on some simpler model.
So the resulting collapse will take out nearly everyone you know.
> Why not simply learn to share for the good of all our relations?
Opinions are shared. Knowledge, for the most part, is shared. Money is a
unit of trust. In the US, we even state that on every money unit.
> Why not make all in-common goods and services free for all?
When the Beast provides us all these "goods and services", they will be
nearly free for all. Until then, you get trusted when you do the work.
> Why not barter for all un-common goods and services?
Because if you don't farm or mine, you are support personnel. Barter
cannot support the population in the world today. Go back to the Dark
Ages, there was room for that then.
David A. Smith
- Next message: Prai Jei: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Previous message: kenseto: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- In reply to: doog: "Re: peak oil revisited"
- Next in thread: Gordon: "Re: peak oil revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]