Re: The Complete Disproof of Relativity and current Quantum Mechanics

From: Jeff (JLeeCforRP_at_aol.com)
Date: 02/17/05 

Date: 16 Feb 2005 16:19:51 -0800

BR,

You are still trying to use the characteristics of a "static" inertial
reference background to describe my "active" inertial reference
background, as do the others in this newsgroup. This is like trying to
use the Epicycle System to describe the motions of the planets around
the Sun. Making the inertial reference background of the universe
"active", rather than static, is like putting the Sun in the center of
the Solar System, as compared to the Earth. All of the measurements and
observations of the "old" system do not apply.

Consequently, if you tried to calculate the true orbits of the planets
using the "old" system, you would have to use "fudge" factors, etc. to
make it appear to come out right. Once we put the Sun in the center,
the fudge factors disappear. This is exactly why Theoretical Physics
today uses "fudge" factors to try and explain the universe: "missing
dark matter?", "imaginery time?, "ficititious centrifugal force?", "the
Uncertainty Principle?", etc.

With Reality Physics we are able to use the de Broglie equation to, for
the first time in the history of QM, describe the correct wavelengths
of the atom, and the photons emitted by the electron jumps (no "fudge"
factors needed). So just as the Heloicentric System agrees with
planetary motion, whereas the Epicycle System does not, Reality Physics
agrees with the atom whereas current QM and Relativity do not

 For example: Can you give me a real physical relationship of motion to
space and time directly responsible for the NONLINEAR rate time
dilation occurs with respect to a linear incremental increase in
velocity as mathematically described by the Fitzgerald Formula? The
answer to that question is No if you subscribe to Relativity. With
Reality Physics there is a real physical relationship revealing why a
NONLINEAR amount of time dilation corresponds to a linear incremental
increase in velocity, and why a clock's hands stop rotating as it
reaches the speed of light, and why a photon will never record the
passing of any time at all.

So why don't you tell me why, when a moving clock reaches the speed
light, it experiences an infinite time dilation, as mathematically
described by the Fitzgerald Formula. I can give you a real PHYSICAL
reason from Reality Physics as to why this happens, can you give me the
real physical reason from Relativity, or anything else you might know,
that would account for this?

all the best,

Jeff Lee CENTER FOR REALITY PHYSICS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Relevant Pages