Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? lost war
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:34:19 -0500
The railguns all came up stupid.
The 2 winners are ;;;;
$ 30,000 mini RC tank 1 ton .
with 2 cams side by side for strio vsion and 3d helmit. A diesel tank
8 feet long wit lockouts.
$ 30,000 lite atv RC dual cam sterio vision
in heat or day vision .
a lock out is you must open it like a code lock or it blows up and no
one can open it.
The widow watcher is the atv and can hammer the *** out of them with
twin 50s.
The tank has rockets and a big 3 inch.
They are street cleaners.
What the army neads is better street cleaners.
They can patrole the un patroleable.
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: 1905 Einstein's Relativity&Potential Energy"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]