Re: Postulate #2: Time Dilation

From: Eric Gisse (jowr.pi_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/17/05 

Date: 17 Feb 2005 07:36:17 -0800

g...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Postulate #2:
>
> Plane leaves an Inertial Reference Frame Platform and reaches a
> constant velocity of c/3, travels a certain distance and then returns
> to the Platform.
>
> Time dilated during acceleration becomes *less and less a relevant*
> factor to the plane's TOTAL time dilation the *FURTHER* the Planes
> travels.

Your postulate is useless, much like yourself.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... It appears that, again, you are assuming a vector sum for the ... To express such distance in S', one has to use t', thus ... If the signal travels toward negative x, ... Because of that postulate, a light signal travelling along the y' access must have speed 'c'. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... To express such distance in S', one has to use t', thus ... it travels obliquely, for, while the signal goes ... Einstein got that equation from his light postulate. ... Let the stick be set moving relative to S at such velocity that it is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Postulate #2: Time Dilation
    ... travels a certain distance and then returns ... Your postulate is useless, much like yourself. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Postulate #2: Time Dilation
    ... > constant velocity of c/3, travels a certain distance and then returns ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Postulate #2: Time Dilation
    ... > constant velocity of c/3, travels a certain distance and then returns ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)