Re: An interesting SR puzzle
From: Franz Heymann (notfranz.heymann_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: John Kennaugh: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:38:56 +0000 (UTC)
"John Kennaugh" <JKNG@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
message news:rbNSCNSlU5ECFwGh@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk...
> In message <cudv81$qd9$1@dolly.uninett.no>, Paul B. Andersen
> <paul.b.andersen@deletethishia.no> writes
> >Sue... wrote:
> >> An event can't be observed before it occurs but calculate to your
> >> heart's content if it makes you feel better.
> >> Sue...
> >>
> >
> >I suppose this truism is supposed to be a defence of your
> >statement:
> >Sue wrote:
> >| Anyone observing a blueshifted clock at constant distance, will
sooner
> >| or later be expected to observe a tick before it occurs, an
obvious
> >| causality violation.
> >
> >This time I am asking you:
> >How did you arrive at this conclusion?
> >Show the logic.
> >Repeating the conclusion won't do.
> >
> >But you won't because you can't, right?
>
> If something is 'blueshifted' it is coming towards you, so surely
> observing something blueshifted cannot be at a constant distance by
> definition. - or have I missed something.
Yes, you have. You and the clock might be at different positions in a
gravitational field.
-- Franz One Galileo in 2000 years is enough. Pope Pius XII
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Inertial-dampening systems"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: John Kennaugh: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: An interesting SR puzzle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|