Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Mass/enertia in weightlessness - cars in space!"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:07:03 GMT
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:46:47 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Lester Zick wrote:
>
>> But there is for how they move vacuum tubes or valves as the British
>> call them.
>
>So what. No one uses them for computers any more. They are slow, they
>are unreliable and they have a short mean time between failures.
Hardly relevant to your QM claims. The technology was clearly
developed before QM became relevant to its development. Maybe you
should be trying to establish QM's claims to Tinker Toys instead.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Mass/enertia in weightlessness - cars in space!"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Richard Herring: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|