Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon
From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: mikelist: "Re: *Boycott* liberals!"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Feynman Lectures on X-ons"
- In reply to: Q-on: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Next in thread: Q-on: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Reply: Q-on: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:42:21 +0100
Q-on wrote:
> Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
>
[snip]
> Well. I'm not in contact with Randi yet because of
> waiting for the status of the visa and want to have
> rough idea of physics of qi first.
That's not necessary for Randi's test. He says *specifically*
that he is not interested in hearing theories about how
the claimed effect works. He only wants to have a demonstration
*that* it works.
> I don't want to
> have bad interview with Randi and being blacklisted
> for the challenge.
Interview? Blacklisted?
Thanks for showing yet again that you have no clue how
Randi's challenge and tests actually work.
> So want to be prepare first for
> all the consequences. If I'd do the qi ball tests.
> It would be with him as prematurely demonstrating
> it to you can seriously limit my changes of getting
> the money.
Do you really think there are people somewhere in the world
reading sci.physics and eagerly waiting for you to spill
out the details about the test, so that they can beat you
to Randi? Read up on "paranoia".
If you really think that, we could switch to private e-mail
for discussing the test.
> Another thing is I wonder if there would
> be people who'd stop me and I have to sensitive
> to this because if the elite group of say Illuminati
> want the secrets of paranormal science to be kept
> hidden. I may become target of their psi warriors
> and may not have the defense against them.
Yes, you should definitely read up on "paranoia".
> So I'm
> not in a hurry for this Randi thing because I have
> to think of many things first.
I see that you are still busy making up lame excuses.
[snip]
> Do you know what
> equipments can I get which can make me vary
> the frequency of say 220 volts electricity from
> 10 hertz to 1000 hertz and this can be outputted
> with magnetic field in some kind of coil?
No. I'm a theoretical physicists. I don't know much
about experimental equipment.
[snip]
Bye,
Bjoern
- Next message: mikelist: "Re: *Boycott* liberals!"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Feynman Lectures on X-ons"
- In reply to: Q-on: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Next in thread: Q-on: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Reply: Q-on: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|