Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
From: Jeany (ctiei_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Previous message: Dr. Photon: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Maybe in reply to: Koobee Wublee: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Next in thread: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Reply: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Feb 2005 04:53:55 -0800
Why can nobody explain this question?
> I am not sure if u=u' is an assertion or experimental fact?
> Theory of Analytical Space-Time tells us that u is not equal to u' in
> coordinates transformation.
> I think this is an important basis to understand SR.
> For detail, please see http://www.tastphysics.com or
> http://cuisilong.itgo.com
============================================
>Why can nobody explain this question?
>> I am not sure if u=u' is an assertion or experimental fact?
OK! I think I can explain the question!!
(1) It's not a question, it's a declarative statement, folllowed by
a question mark?
(2) The explanation is buried deep within your unconscious,
and will require years of psychoanalysis to uncover?
(3) It is, with the exception of the appendation of a question
mark to a declarative sentence, a crypto-grammatical or well-
formed but ill-posed utterance?
(4) " u=u' " itself is neither an assertion nor an experimental
fact, but a string of four symbols from a character set?
Many, many more explanations of your important question
suggest themselves, but the bit margin is too small to
contain them. However I would suggest that it is an
experimental fact that " u=u' " is an assertion, while
simultaneously asserting that u'=u is an experimental fact!
Nobody has proved me wrong!
>> Theory of Analytical Space-Time tells us that u is not equal to u' in
>> coordinates transformation.
>> I think this is an important basis to understand SR.
>> For detail, please see http://newmind.best.163.com/tast/ or
>> http://cuisilong.itgo.com
I am pleased to report to you that multiple teams of
interdisciplinary scientists are even now exploring the
ramifications of your theories, and President Bush has
been called. A grateful nation waits with baited breath,
and struggles to remove the hook from its mouth.
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Previous message: Dr. Photon: "Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?"
- Maybe in reply to: Koobee Wublee: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Next in thread: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Reply: Len Gaasenbeek: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|