Re: The universe has no boundaries?
From: Nick (macromitch_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/19/05
- Next message: Mike: "Here goes the "expert" Dinkey-Donkey"
- Previous message: Tom Capizzi: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: The universe has no boundaries?"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: The universe has no boundaries?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Feb 2005 18:44:13 -0800
Franz Heymann wrote:
> "Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1108694858.691905.236160@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > If it started without gravity as some promote
> > it violates the No Boundary Proposal.
> >
> > No gravity means boundaries.
> >
> > The mass singularity of the BB is wrong.
> > Its gravity would prevent it - i.e. a black hole.
> > Space-time starting as a point without mass
> > is another story.
> > Mass had to be created seperated and expanding;
> > if you keep gravity; which also is to have no
> > boundaries.
>
> I defy you to put your hand on your heart and say truly that you
> understand what that last sentence means, and that you have conveyed
> that meaning to your readers.
Go for it Franz!!
You tell me
- Next message: Mike: "Here goes the "expert" Dinkey-Donkey"
- Previous message: Tom Capizzi: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: The universe has no boundaries?"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: The universe has no boundaries?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
