Re: What kind of physics is the End of Time?
From: Morituri-|-Max (newage_at_sendarico.net)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: TomGee: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Previous message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: What kind of physics is the End of Time?"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: What kind of physics is the End of Time?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:14:16 GMT
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> "Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1108875396.746920.186510@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Time never ends; neither in gravity nor by motion.
>
> Mitch Raemsch never leaves, neither by getting his
> bottom kicked nor by getting his teeth kicked out.
>
>> GR is in conflict with SR since it is clearly seen
>> in SR that matter cannot reach light speed;
>
> The universe is in conflict with Mitch Raemsch since
> it is clearly seen in Mitch Raemsch that information
> cannot reach the inner parts of his brain.
Amen
- Next message: TomGee: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Previous message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- In reply to: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: What kind of physics is the End of Time?"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: What kind of physics is the End of Time?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|