Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?

From: Mark Fergerson (nunya_at_biz.ness)
Date: 02/20/05 

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:35:53 -0700

kenseto wrote:
> "Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> wrote in message
> news:%I6Rd.32829$6u.27726@fed1read02...
>
>>kenseto wrote:
>>
>>>"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> wrote in message
>>>news:izIPd.21589$6u.6591@fed1read02...

>>>>kenseto wrote:

>>>>>"A.S." <arnoldschrod68@go.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:1108246357.454845.92340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>>>>kenseto wrote:
>>>>
>>>><brevity snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>You stated in your paper that there is only one particle in the
>>>>>>universe called S-Particle and the way it moves around the
>>>>>>E-String give rises to all the particles and forces in physics.
>>>>>> You also mentioned about E-Matrix.
>>>>
>>>>>The E-Matrix is a term used to represent all the E-Strings
>>>>>occupying all of space. IOW the E-Matrix is space.
>>>>
>>>>And this "E-matrix" must not move in whole or in part, otherwise
>>>>there's no background against which to measure Absolute Motion.
>>>>Right?
>>
>>>Not right. Absolute motion is that motion of an object (an S-Particle
>>>or an S-Particle system) wrt the wave packets (photons) in the
>>>E-Matrix. Each of these wave packets are being transmitted by the
>>>neighboring E-Strings at a speed c.
>>
>> Ah, you have Absolute Motion wrt light.
>>
>> How can anything be transmitted from one E-string to a "neighboring"
>>one if the E-strings fill _all of space_? What's between the E-strings?

> Lights are wave-packets in E-Strings. Each wave-packet (a photon) is
> composed of blocks of waves in neighboring E-Strings and these blocks of
> waves move coherently along these neighboring E-Strings at speed c to give
> the apparent of a particle. This is the reason why light appears to have
> duality characteristics. For a description of a photon please visit my
> website and click on to the section entitled "Past Experiments Detecting
> Absolute Motion".
> http://www.erinet.com/kenseto/book.html
> There is void between the E-Strings.

   Then this "void" is not part of "all of space" filled by the
E-strings? It thus has no interaction with E-strings or particles
confined to them?

>>>>>>So in your hypotheses that we are all moving with respect to
>>>>>>the Aether.
>>>>
>>>>>The E-Matrix is the aether. The E-Matrix is stationary and
>>>>>elastic. It can be deformed with the passage of particles and the
>>>>>deformation is recovered after the passage of the S-Particle.
>>>>
>>>>Then the part of this "E-matrix" in the act of being deformed or
>>>>recovering from a deformation has motion WRT the part(s) of it not
>>>>being deformed or recovering from a deformation.
>>
>>>No....there is no motion between different regions of the E-Matrix.
>>>Any local deformation becomes global deformation due to the fact that
>>>the E-Strings are elastic and are repulsive to each other.
>>
>> What definition of "deform" are you using that does not include motion
>>of component parts wrt each other?

> You push on a piece of rubber you get deformation (distortion) throughout
> the rubber. That's what I mean by deformation (distortion)

   Yes, and the component parts of the rubber must move wrt each other
in order for the shape of the bulk to distort. You should not offer
analogies that do not accurately model the properties of what you're
trying to analogize.

   After all, Relativists no longer offer the "rubber sheet" analogy of
gravitation.

>> How can a deformation propagate in a medium whose parts are incapable
>>of moving wrt each other?

> The deformation will move along with the particle that deforms the
> surrounding E-Strings

   Well now; it seems that deformation of the E-strings must be confined
to the "void" between them and is not observable from the POV of a
particle confined to one of them or a collection of particles so
confined, is that what you meant to say?

>> FTM, what do you propose as the propagation velocity of these
>>deformations?

> The deformation move at the same speed as the motion of the particles in the
> E-Matrix.

   Then the particles could be directly characterized as deformations of
the strings themselves, and need not be separate entities.

>>>>How do you tell if the part of this "E-matrix" you're doing your
>>>>measurements in isn't already deformed and by how much?
>>
>>>The S-Particle system is doing the measurements. The measurement
>>>result is dependent on the deformation of the E-Strings to which the
>>>S-Particle system is confined.
>>
>> Then it can also measure the deformation of "neighboring" E-strings
>>via the photons propagated from them.

> Yes it measures the deformation as well as the wave-packets that are being
> transmitted by the E-Strings.

   Right across the "void"? Light propagates across the "void"? This
implies that the "void" has distinct properties that determine c. You
have merely pushed "the Aether" one layer deeper than usual.

>>>>IOW, if an "S-particle" is orbiting an already-deformed "E-string",
>>>>its motion must differ from that of one orbiting an undisturbed
>>>>"E-string".
>>
>>>An orbiting S-Particle will react to the deformation or waves in the
>>>E-String(s) to which it is confined by the orbiting motion. This
>>>reaction of the orbiting S-Particles to the geometry of the E-Stirngs
>>>is the observed action-at-a-distance.
>>
>> How does the geometry of the E-strings change without them moving wrt
>>each other?

> They all deform together as the particles are moving through them.

   They cannot, if their degree of deformation is communicated at c
through the "void". There will be a delay.

>>>>>>Is the E-Matrix itself moving too
>>>>
>>>>>No...the E-Matrix comprised of the E-Strings is not moving. That
>>>>>means that the E-Strings are not moving. But thye E-Strings can
>>>>>be deformed (or distorted) by the passage of the S-Particles.
>>>>
>>>>Then when "deformed", some part of it has motion WRT the rest of
>>>>it. How do you tell if the part of space you're doing your
>>>>measurements in isn't already "deformed"?
>>
>>>I already explained this earlier.
>>
>> No, you didn't. How can anything deform when its constituent parts
>>cannot move wrt each other?

> The E-Strings are repulsive to each other. So if one is deformed the other
> next to it will also be deformed.

   Then the repulsive force must be transmitted through the "void".

>>>>>>or is it just the E-String or S-Particle?
>>>>
>>>>>Only the S-Particles are moving in the stationary E-Matrix.
>>>>
>>>>Except those "E-strings" in the act of being deformed, or
>>>>rebounding from that deformation.
>>
>>>No...the E-Matrix is like a giant rubber ball if one region is
>>>distorted the whole ball is distorted.
>>
>> Poor analogy. The parts of a rubber ball do indeed move wrt each other.

> You can say that if you want.

   It is a fact.

>>>>>>And how the hell would S-Particle moving around the E-String in
>>>>>>a moving E-Matrix (?) create matter?
>>>>
>>>>>An S-Particle orbiting around an E-String in the counterclockwise
>>>>> orbiting motion is negatively charged particle such as the
>>>>>electron.
>>>>
>>>>"Counterclockwise" as seen from which end? Does your system give
>>>>Absolute Direction as well as Absolute Motion?
>>
>>>There is no outside observer. Each orbiting S-Particle will react
>>>with another orbiting S-Particle according to the direction of
>>>orbiting motion.
>>
>> Who said anything about outside observers? I take your explanation to
>>mean another S-particle orbiting the same E-string.
>>
>> Here's an E-string with an orbiting S-particle:
>>
>> ^
>> |
>>------------S------------
>>
>> The arrow indicates that its orbiting that seen from the left end of
>>the E-string is counterclockwise. However, seen from the right-hand end,
>>it's orbiting clockwise.
>
>
> The S-Particle is in a left handed (counterclockwise) or a right handed
> (clockwise)cork screw like motion along an E-String. This is also known as
> chirality. To us as an observer the S-Particles of an electron is in a
> state of counterclockwise orbiting motion around an E-String.

   I'm not speaking of what it might look like to a hypothetical
observer, but to another S-particle on the same E-string.

>> BTW, if the E-matrix fills all of space, where's there room for the
>>S-particles to orbit the E-strings?

> Between the E-Strings and the S-Particles and the E-Strings are repulsive to
> each other.

   Too many "and the"s in that sentence. Parse, please?

>>>If they are orbiting in the same direction then they will attract to
>>>each other. If they are orbiting in the opposite direction then they
>>>will repel each other. I assigned the counterclockwise orbiting
>>>motion to represent a negatively charged particle because an electron
>>>neutrino shows a left handed cork screw (counterclockwise) like
>>>motion in space.
>>
>> Why didn't you just say that? BTW, neutrinos are right-handed when
>>seen from behind. They don't move at c.
>>
>>
>>>>>An S-Particle orbiting around an E-String in a clockwise orbiting
>>>>>motion is a positively charge particle such as the up-quark.
>>>>
>>>>"Clockwise" as seen from which end? Does your system give Absolute
>>>>Direction as well as Absolute Motion?
>>
>>>See above explanation.
>>
>> Fine, except seen from the other end of the string it's going
>>counterclockwise. Is it therefore negatively charged on that side?

> No....the negative charged particle is a left handed cork screw orbiting
> motion. This is true no matter which end you are looking at it.

   Nope. Pick up a corkscrew and look at it from both ends.

   Mark L. Fergerson

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can you decrypt this?
    ... flavours unless Haji will once value afterwards. ... Nowadays, go ... He'll be conveying out of alright Mohammad until his countryside ... What does Aziz store so believably, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Is Ken Seto Genius or Madman?
    ... you have Absolute Motion wrt light. ... Lights are wave-packets in E-Strings. ... >> Any local deformation becomes global deformation due to the fact that ... The deformation move at the same speed as the motion of the particles in the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Any Objections - Adacrypt.
    ... copys Daoud instead. ... plant might fear some horrible males. ... Many alone skins in support of the bare location were ... He may expose weekly triangles up to the possible ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Entropy sources under WinXP
    ... Jimmy concludes the uses believably, Charlene won't seem any ... essential estates. ... Nobody anxiously kneel scientific and drifts our ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Does the Electron Neutrino Have Mass and Charge?
    ... motion of the target. ... And what are E-Strings composed of? ... Apparently you use it with a rather non-standard meaning... ... > You are an idiot. ...
    (sci.physics)