Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism

From: Q-on (physicsofchi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/28/05 

Date: 28 Feb 2005 06:37:05 -0800

http://www.pbase.com/image/40276371/original
(Table 8.6 Proposed Maxwellian Equations for Etheric matter)

http://www.pbase.com/image/40276407/original
(Table 8.5 Amended Maxwell's Equations with Symmetry Parameters)

http://www.pbase.com/image/40276417/original
(Table 8.4 The Classical Maxwells Equations)

Guys, Debunkers. Pls. attack this message on theoretical
grounds. Three Scientists attempted to make the Standard
Model a subset of their enhanced model that can explain
most of what I've experienced in qi related matter, etc.

The following are the exact details of how the atoms are
connected to the holographic energy field according to 3 Ph.Ds
researchers. I'm sorry I didn't notice it before. It's in another
book called The Emergence of a New Physics (Conscious Act of
Creation) by 3 Ph.Ds. William A Tiller Ph.D. Walter E. Dibble Jr,
Ph.D and Michael J. Kohane, Ph.D that I just got from my library
which I forgot to read because I was focusing on Tiller 1st book.
Inside I found what I'm seeking for... their main mechanism
of how exactly the holographic energy field (which they
called magnetoelectric substance mediated by magnetic monopoles)
is connected to the atoms. I shared the following for scrutiny
(and debunking using theoretical reasonings). I also include urls
of formulas of enhanced Maxwellian equations for this magnetic
monopole based superluminal realm which involves the de Broglie
pilot waves existing beyond C with a coupling mechanism that
connects below and above C. Note Born and Schroedinger gave the
current interpretations of QM but in 1920s, prior to that de
Broglie proposed the concept that every particle had a pilot
wave envelope enclosing it and moving at the particle's velocity.
The following are the exact details of the 3 Ph.Ds. with regards
to how the atoms is connected to the energy field via an enhanced
Maxwellian mechanism (pls refer to the urls above for Table
8.4-8.6. I'll continue commenting after the article. See also
)

William A Tiller Ph.D. Walter E. Dibble Jr, Ph.D and Michael J.
Kohane, Ph.D. wrote: (For scrutiny)

"This concept required some new wave components to move into the
envelope and some old wave components to move out as the envelope
moved along. If we call the particle velocity, Vp, and the
velocity of the individual wave components Vw, then relativity
theory requires that the following relationship hold (see
Appendix 2.B for the derivations)

Vp Vw = C ^ 2

where C is the velocity of light. Since Vp < C always, Vw must be
> C always and these waves were denoted "information" waves in
order to not make trouble for relativity theory. Subsequent
experiments showed that particles like neutrons, protons,
electrons, helium atoms, etc., all exhibited wave-like behavior
and de Broglie received a Nobel prize for his seminal work.
Depending upon the design of a particular experiment, the results
showed either particle-like or wave-like behavior so that this
simultaneous particle/wave concept of de Broglie's was
incorporated into QM as wave/particle dualily and came to mean
either/or rather than both for many physicists.

Here, in this book, we firmly return to the original concept of
nature expressing itself simultaneously via its particle aspect
and it's wave aspect and ask how we might formally express this
without losing one aspect or the other. Long experience with the
particle aspect has shown us that distance-time or (x,y,z, ict) -
space, which we can call direct space or D-space, is a
satisfactory coordinate system for describing the behavior of
this aspect of substance. We have also used this coordinate
system for d escribing wave motion, even though the waves of our
cognitive experience are merely modulations of particle fluxes or
particle densities in space-time. It is probably the
misinterpreting of this class of particle modulation wave with
the de Broglie pilot wave that caused QM's founding fathers to
confine the theory to a purely (x,y,z,t) -formalism. The de
Broglie pilot wave is thought to be a waveform of a much more
continuum nature than particle modulation waves.

A Biconformal Base-space Approach

A more appropriate coordinate system for describing de Broglie -
type waves is a reciprocal space or R-space system, (x^
-1,y^-1,z^-1,t^-1). Each of these coordinates is a frequency;
1/distance equals number per unit distance or a spatial frequency
and 1/time equals number per unit time or a temporal frequency.
In solid state physics, wave behavior in R-space is described
using a wave number, (kx, ky, kz, kt), descriptor (each k(alpha),
=2pij/alpha where alpha = x,y,z,int and the quality indicator, j,
may be different than i). Thus, although it is not wrong to
describe both the particle aspect and the de Broglie wave aspect
in terms (x,y,z,ict) - space, as is done in QM, it entangles the
two aspects in a very complex fashion and leads directly to the
QM-black box nature. For this reason, a better approach would be
to keep the particle aspect and the wave aspect separate, using
the D-space coordinate system for the one and the Rspace coordi
nate system for th e other. Following this approach, any formal
description of substance behavior would involve at least the
eight coordinates (x, y, z, ict, kx, ky, kz, kt). However, since
Vp < C and Vw > C, the two aspects cannot directly interact with
each other because of relativity theory; therefore it is
necessary to invent the presence of an additional substance that
is rot constrained by relativity theory, because these two
aspects clearly interact in the de Broglie particle/pilot wave
picture. This will he more fully explained in Chapters 7 and 8.

The moieties of this coupling substance are thought to be from
the domain of emotion and have been labeled deltrons, by one of
us. This means that any formal description of substance behavior
in nature, without any human intervention, involves at least 9
coordinates (x, y, z, ict; kX1 kyl kzl kt; C(alpha) where
C(alpha0) is the cosmic background activated deltron
concentration. When human intervention, via human consciousness
in the form of the application of human intentionality acts on
nature, one must ad d at least one more coordinate to any
meaningful description of nature. Thus, formal description of
nature, which includes human intention, involves at least ten
coordinates (x, y, z, ict; kx, ky, kz, kt; C(alpha); I*) where I*
represents the intensity of human intention and it influences the
magnitude of C(alpha) (Chapter 8 is devoted to showing how
particles, expressing themselves in the dual 4-spaces, interact
with each other).

(snip)

Because of the conceptual separation of physical substance into
D-space and R-space aspects with descriptors separated into
(x,y,z,t) - vs (kx,ky,kz,kt) - behavior, the de Broglie
particle/pilot wave concept of Figure 2.1 needs to be expanded to
express a moving particle at the instantaneous location
(x',y',z',t') in D-space and its connected pilot wave at the
specific location (k'x,k'y,k'z,k't) in R-space. This alteration
will be developed more fully in Chapter 8. Here, we merely seed
the new picture for the reader and utilize Figure 2.4 to
concretize it somewhat. The implication is that that particle
event in D-space is intimately and lawfully connected to the
pilot wave event in R-space. From this, the reader can begin to
qualitatively see how R-space wave events can influence remote
D-space particle events (see Chapter 8)

Electromagnetism (EM) and Magnetoelectrism (ME): The classical
Maxwell equations of EM that one can find in thousands of
textbooks on the subject are given in Table 8.4. From the top
down, these are the representations, respectively, of the
experimentally determined laws of Gauss, Faraday, Coulomb and
Ampere. The gauge symmetry for this system of fields is U(1)
Gauge and its algebra is Abelian; i.e., the commutation law for
two such fields X and Y is

[X,Y] = X Y - Y X = 0.

This is to be compared with non-Abelian algebra where one has
Maxwellian electrodynamics is generally thought to be one of the
most elegant and perfect theories in physics. However, towards
the end of the last century, many began to realize that there
were several flaws inherent in its Iinear structure.

It is well known that nature generally displays properties of
symmetry (when looked at from the proper reference frame).
Surprisingly, although magnetism is a physical observable, it
does not observationally manifest as a monopole but only as a
dipolar quality. This is inherent in the "source free"
implication of Equation (1) in Table 8.4. Although 20th century
science looked long and hard for these magnetic monopoles, no
satisfactory experimental evidence has been found to reveal their
physical existence. As might be expected, this has not totally
deterred some individuals from incorporating these moieties into
their theoretical considerations. Harmuth, while attempting to
calculate transient EM behavior from antennae, showed that the
Maxwell's Equations of Table 8.4 fail for waves with
non-negligible losses because of singularities encountered in the
course of the calculation. However the equations succeed when a
magnetic current density (moving magnetic monopoles) is
introduced into the equation set and th en shrunk to zero when
one has reached the last singularity (but not before). As one
other example among many, Seiberg and Witten found that, in the
four dimensional quantum field theory, supersymmetry, certain key
mathematical singularities could be eliminated by introducing
magnetic monopoles. They were able to show that the magnetic
monopoles became massless right when the equations, in the
absence of these monopoles, explode to infinity.

Barrett may have cleared up the dilemma by pointing out that the
Maxwell equation Gauge symmetry is of the U(1) form when only
electric charge and electric currents are present hut is of the
more complex SU(2) form when magnetic charges and currents are
also present. U(1) fields are known to have fewer local degrees
of freedom than SUP fields and SUP fields can he transformed into
U(1) fields by the process of symmetry breaking. However, after
symmetry breaking, only some topological charges are conserved;
electric charge is conserved while magnetic charge is not.
Harmuth's amended Maxwell's equations and Barrett's identity
relationships between the SU(2) symmetry and the U(1) symmetry
are shown in Table 8.5.

When we turn, now, to a D-space/deltron/R-space frame of
reference and a partially conditioned locale, we must expect
something very close to that shown in Table 8.6 to hold,
following the notation of Table 8.5. Because this new approach is
still a work in progress, it is more illustrative than exact
(particularly the R-space component). It is the degree of
conditioning that determines the magnitude of the coupling
parameters alpha(d), alpha ' (d), alpha(r) and alpha ' (r). As a
pathway to solving this set of equations and to gaining some
understanding of Table 8.6, we first recognize that (Ed, Hd) come
from solving the equations of Table 8.4 for the fully uncoupled
condition (s et alpha d = alpha ' d = 0). Likewise, (Er, Hr)
comes fro mthe analogous set of fully uncoupled R-space equations
(set alpha (r) = alpha ' (r) = 0). Thus, for any values of alpha
d, alpha ' d, alpha r and alpha ' r not equal to zero we can, in
principle, calculate i(Er), i(Hr), i(Ed), and i(Hd) so that an
internally self-consistent set of E, H, E and H can be determined
by an iterative procedure. This set yields what we have
heretofore called augmented electromagnetism involving the use of
IIED's. One of us has already speculated on the possibility that
the (E,H) set yields Qi If this supposition is correct then, just
as the broad EM spectrum provides us with a connection between
many seemingly diverse phenomena, the overall ME spectrum may do
likewise for the many forms of Qi. (q-on note; Tiller is not
referring to the "qi" in his Qi here)

As a closing perspective on this section, it is important to
recognize that a variety of other investigators have also used
higher dimensional frameworks as base spaces for the expression
of nature's laws . The closest one of these to the model utilized
in this book is that utilized by Wheeler mentioned in Chapter 7
(see page 249). The general advantage of such an approach is that
one has an additional set of uncommitted field components and
material parameters with which to rationalize heretofore
unexplain ed phenomena. In addition, one usually has a detailed
quantitative vehicle with which to match such experimental data
and one may make specific predictions as a basis for future
experiments. Only detailed experimental assessment, using clearly
defined protocols, allows one to meaningfully discriminate
between these various possibilities.

In the Inomata (13) framework, complex components were introduced
into the electric and magnetic field vectors with imaginary.
magnetic charge and current. This led to "mirror" type Maxwell
equations with one set being mathematically real and the other
set being imaginary. In the Rauscher(14) framework, an 8-space
was utilized with 4 real (x,y,z,t) and four imaginary
(x',y',z',t'). She generates longitudinal components of E and B
as a projection from the complex 8-space onto the mathematically
real 4-space. Evans on the other hand, somewhat follows Barrett
by introducing a non-Abelian gauge and also a complexification of
E and B. However, he focuses on terms of the form E +- B and
generates a longitudinal field which he calls B. He maps the U(1)
Gauge onto the 02 symmetry group, which describes rotation in a
plane (a 2-D group). He also maps the SU(2) Gauge onto the
isomorphic 03 symmetry group, which describes rotation in three
dim ensions. In refe rence 16, an entire journal issue has been
devoted to these symmetry questions, particularly as they relate
to electromagnetism.

------------------------------------

Back to Q-on.

The above is stretching the Standard Model of physics to its
maximum limit to explain the physics of qi without resorting to
alternative Standard Model. Notice Tiller and Ph.D. company are
attempting to turn the Standard Model into a subset. About the
deltron particles. On the surface, it may be strange. But how
else can you explain the mechanism by which a qi veteran can
attack you anywhere you are in the planet by affecting your
holographic energy field which can affect your physical body. We
qi healers treat victims of this superluminal sorcery and there
are so numerous of this in the Philippines. Look. If Tiller model
of qi physics is false. Then its possible Standard Model has a
flaw that may need perhaps an enhanced Thomsonian Aether Model,
etc. or Modified Lorentz Ether Theory, etc, But before venturing
into this search. I'd like to see how you guys can debunk Tiller
on purely theoretical grounds. BTW.. in the following qi china
experiment where substances can be altered by intention and qi.
The mechanisms proposed in the article above may be the mechanism
of interactions (pending other mechanisms in an alternative
Standard Model)

http://www.accessv.com/~yuan/yansci/time/2002_YanXin_Qigong_JSE.pdf

See also this url for Tiller stuff and his new work coming
April 2005 that can rock the foundation of physics (if his
theoretical grounds has basis in reality):

http://www.tillerfoundation.com

(BTW.. his old book "Conscious Act of Creation (Emergence of a
New Physics)" has many circuits where you can allegedly prove
that intention can affect matter thru his proposed mechanisms.
I haven't built any of the circuits for testing yet)

q-on

Relevant Pages

  • Re: yet another major disaster in the fossil fuel industry....13....
    ... !Note carefully that the fuel for nuclear reactors is totally ... why the fuss about Iran? ... the enrichment process for longer.... ... there are some wildly conflicting reports regarding deaths due ...
    (uk.politics.misc)
  • MARTIRI PE DRACU
    ... ROMANII DE RAND AM UITAT CE-ATI FACUT DIN ROMANIA! ... VOI SINTETI BALASTUL PESTILENTIAL PE CARE TRECUTUL BURGHEZO-MOSIERESC ...
    (soc.culture.romanian)
  • Re: "Your account has now been permanently disabled".http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5507229....S
    ... KostASS gogu golanule PapafloraTOSS the usenet NAZI from Kalamaria used his keyboard to write: ... in codesto reame debban risolversi tutte con grandi ... that face,the rage he exhibits in his videos, his own admission that his son Andrew is gay.Was the poor Andrew born gay or daddy Seanie made the poor boy hide daddy's salami? ...
    (soc.culture.greek)
  • oh the joys of socialism.....prodi in charge....
    ... "Life in Italy's second city threatened to grind to a standstill this ... evil-smelling crescendo. ... Huge piles of uncollected rubbish have accumulated across the city, ... Protests rage in five locations selected for emergency landfills; ...
    (uk.politics.misc)
  • Re: The Emission Theory of Androcles
    ... The star is seen behind where it actually is. ... But the wave front is coming from a different direction, ... So any individual particle of light is traveling in a straight line from ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)