Re: Expanding Space

From: kenseto (kenseto_at_erinet.com)
Date: 02/28/05 

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:37:58 GMT

"Dave P." <davep@home.com> wrote in message
news:sk6521dumokfggs9h7431qe342hhq147gb@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:45:42 GMT, "kenseto" <kenseto@erinet.com>
> wrote:
>
>

> >
> >No I have my own idea and it is described in the following link:
> >http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf
> >
> >Ken Seto
> >
>
> Wow... I just breezed through your link. Your paper is so
> chock-a-block full of invented theories and specious conclusions I
> wonder that you have the gall to be so antagonistic about inflation
> simply on the basis that it is an unproven hypothosis.

I see that you finally saw the light that the concept of expansion into
pre-existing space is a valid concept.:-)

>It appears
> everything in you paper is invented and unproven.

It is proven by existing experiments and observations. My model of the
universe agrees with all existing experiments and observations

>And, given your
> abject inability to grasp the balloon analogy or to understand the
> simple dynamics of explosions, I suspect your theories are also
> unprovable.

Who is unable to grasp the dynamics of explosion?? Didn't you insisted that
you need to be at the point of explosion to see matters are flying away from
each other?? You didn't grasp the fact that each object in the explosion
will see other objectss in the explosion are flying away from it in all
directions.
>
> Your paper proposes an experiment to conclusively prove your aether
> theory. Have you conducted the experiment and verified the results, or
> are you jumping the gun on assertions that the aether is an observable
> fact?

The proposed experiment will be able to falsify or verify my theory. That's
more than any current theory can say.
>
> Or is it a thought experiment? If so, I don't think you have the
> equipment to carry it out.

Hey idiot...it is not merely a thought experiment. It is a very doable
experiment The Model Mechanical (MM) predictions of this experiment are not
the same as the predictions of SR for this experiment. This means that this
experiment will falsify SR or MM.
You are right....I don't have the equipment to carry it out. I applied for
funding to do the experiment from the NSF but my application was rejected
without comment.

Ken Seto

Ken Seto

Relevant Pages
Quantcast