Re: Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism
From: Q-on (physicsofchi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Robert Clark: "Re: About the "Mars in two weeks" nuclear rocket."
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Q-on: "Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism"
- Next in thread: Mark Palenik: "Re: Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Feb 2005 07:35:52 -0800
To continue with the above. I forgot to include the paragraphs
about the magnetic monopoles and how they all relate. The
following paragraph is after the " <snip>" part above: (note
that these two messages answered the questions Mark asked "1. How
do the magnetic monopoles communicate? 2. What is the relationship of
electromagnetism to the energy field? 3. How are the atoms
connected to the holographic energy field?"
Tiller and 2 other Ph.D. scientists wrote:
A Higher Dimensional Framework
A diagrammatic representation of this functionality is given in
Figure 2.2. There, we see our cognitive domain that we call
physical reality in the center and a dual or conjugate 4-space
reality connected to it. In the esoteric literature, this has
been labeled "etheric reality. Here, we make the additional
postulate that the moieties that write the waves in this etheric
or (kx, ky, kz, kt) space are the magnetic monopoles. Thus, the
electric monopoles operate in direct-space while the magnetic
monopoles operate in reciprocal space with a very special type of
"mirror" relationship (not a reflection mirror) functioning
between them(2) (see Chapters 7 and 8). Via this unique mirror,
the magnetic monopoles of R-space generate magnetic dipole images
in D- space while the electric monopoles of D-space generate
electric dipole images in R-space. This leads to our normal
Maxwell equations for electromagnetism functioning in Dspace and
another set of analogous equations for magnetoelectrism
functioning in R-space . This is illustrated in Table 2. 1. We
will see later in Chapter 8, where we deal with the quantitative
physics perspective, that this procedure allows us to predict how
the non-local forces vary from point-to-point in Dspace
(space-time) via natural events occurring in R-space. Thus, this
general approach allows us to totally eliminate the thre e major
dichotomies of QM listed earlier. We will also see later in
Chapter 8 that a part of the R-space behavior is present in every
physical measurement that anyone makes so that a new definition
of what one takes to be a physical quality must eventually he
made.
- Next message: Robert Clark: "Re: About the "Mars in two weeks" nuclear rocket."
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Q-on: "Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism"
- Next in thread: Mark Palenik: "Re: Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
