Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: "Dream" Americans driving Iranian cars :-)"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:15:27 -0500
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
> Somehow, Allan, I think that sense of differences is inherent to the
> functioning of the brain and purpose of mind.
What mind? In ten thousand years of slicing and dicing human corpses
from crown to toe no sign of a mind has ever been found.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: "Dream" Americans driving Iranian cars :-)"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|