Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?
From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Cerberus and Quine"
- Previous message: adpis: "Re: GOD=G_uv"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Mar 2005 04:23:45 -0800
Franz Heymann wrote:
> "JM Albuquerque" <jm.aREM.OVE@sapo.pt> wrote in message
> news:38hq00F5n299jU1@individual.net...
[...]
> > The fact is that I want to learn why it radiates and not induces,
> and so on,
> > and so on.
>
> There are an induction field as well as a radiation field associated
> with a rotating or oscillating dipole in free space. The field has
> one term which decreases as r^-2 and a second term which decreases as
> r^-1. The former is the induction field. It has a component in the
> direction of propagation. It dominates at small distances from the
> oscillator. The latter is the radiated field. It dominates at large
> distances, and it has components which are at right angles to each
> other and to the direction of propagation
Well ain't that pretty.
Franz with the blessing of Bjeorn and Crieghton
have decided a rotating electostatic dipole
radiates just like a rotating bar magnetic.
Well that old theory about the ground state of
da Hydrogen atom not radiating, you know, details
like that pesky Quantum Theory, aren't needed
acording to the 3 wise men. They've pronounced
otherwise.
They say rotating dipoles radiate no matter what.
So far the've managed to eliminate Maxwell's EM,
SR, GR and QT, damn my TEEVEE just blinked off,
they must be right. You'all better stop shaving
and wrap a towel around you head to fit in.
Me thinks JM may be absorbed by "the body".
Ken S. Tucker
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Cerberus and Quine"
- Previous message: adpis: "Re: GOD=G_uv"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|