Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors
From: OG (owen_at_gwynnefamily.org.uk)
Date: 03/18/05
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Urea"
- Previous message: bolt_rollins_at_yahoo.com: "Re: OK That's it"
- In reply to: tadchem: ""Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Reply: tadchem: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:40:52 -0000
"tadchem" <thomas.davidson@dla.mil> wrote in message
news:1111172819.139628.284530@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> This is the same kind of thinking
What "same kind of thinking" ?
>that has driven bad science in the
> name of climate research, environmentalism, and some suspicious
medical
> studies...
Just because you don't like the results of research don't mean its 'bad
science'.
Get a copy of the 5th March New Scientist and read the Essay on Michael
Crichton's State of Fear.
As if money from oil and coal companies is going to pay for unbiased
research.
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Urea"
- Previous message: bolt_rollins_at_yahoo.com: "Re: OK That's it"
- In reply to: tadchem: ""Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Reply: tadchem: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]