Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism
From: Bohl (aharanovbohm_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/19/05
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Previous message: Schoenfeld: "Re: Relativity question"
- In reply to: hhc314_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Mar 2005 17:36:14 -0800
hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:
> In a nutshell, aren't all EM waves 'transverse'?
>
> Harry C.
Beats me. Well in medieval times, people don't know electromagnetic
waves (light) fill the air... so who knows.. perhaps other waves
fill the air too that is not EM transverse waves but its cousins
not yet detectable by present instruments.
Anyway. Let me just focus on the first paragraph. Can you show
what this means "whenever an EM wave starts to
form, both the transverse and longitudinal waves start to form.
However, the transverse wave has a function, which cancels the
longitudinal wave. So if that function persists, we get the
familiar EM wave. Now when we cancel the normal wave, we cancel
the component that had cancelled the LW (scalar wave). So we get
out a LW (scalar wave)".
What function is he talking about available in transverse wave
that cancel the longitudinal wave?
Bohl
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Previous message: Schoenfeld: "Re: Relativity question"
- In reply to: hhc314_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Hidden Richness in Electromagnetism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|