Re: A New Foundation for Physics
From: Prescott (whatishiggs_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/19/05
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Previous message: Repeating Rifle: "Re: Derivation of Collision Rate"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: A New Foundation for Physics"
- Next in thread: David Thomson: "Re: A New Foundation for Physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Mar 2005 15:58:12 -0800
Franz Heymann wrote:
> I intensely dispute that all matter is made of protons and electrons.
> There are neutrons present in every nucleus except that of hydrogen.
>
> > Good. This will make it easier to understand how a neutron
> possesses
> > electrostatic charge, even though it is neutral electrostatic
> charge. A
> > neutron, unlike the teachings of the SM, is a bound proton and
> electron.
>
> I thought you were leading up to this.
> Now tell us why a neutron can be a spin 1 particle if it is a bound
> state between a proton and an electron.
This is the most important question of all. Thomson suggested
a neutron is just composed of proton and electron. Heymann (the
future Feynman) asked how can neutron be spin 1 particle if it is
bound state between proton and electron. If Thomson can answer
it. Then good. If Thomson can't answer it. Then there is no
point in giving out more details of other things when this very
basic one can't even be answered.
Also what is your thought about the double slit experiment,
Thomson? How come when only one photon comes out at a time,
it can still cause interference?? This is the central problem
in quantum physics. If your model is supposed to replace it.
You must answer this. If you can't answer this. Then sorry,
your model doesn't make any logical sense.
Prescott
>
> > The anti-neutrino is merely captured dark matter as a result of the
> binding.
> > When the binding is released, the dark matter angular momentum is
no
> longer
> > a part of the matter and goes back to where dark matter exists.
You
> will
> > need to understand the Aether in order to benefit from this
> knowledge, but
> > it is well worth it. I have an equation that quantifies the
> anti-neutrino
> > as a result of a bound electron and proton that captures dark
> matter.
>
> You've tried this one before as well. I'll give PD the pleasure of
> tearing you to strips this time.
>
> --
> Franz
> "One Galileo in 2000 years is enough."
> Pope Pius XII
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: "Political Correctness" drives scientific errors"
- Previous message: Repeating Rifle: "Re: Derivation of Collision Rate"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: A New Foundation for Physics"
- Next in thread: David Thomson: "Re: A New Foundation for Physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|