Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!
From: John Sefton (vegan16_at_accesscomm.ca)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Next in thread: John Sefton: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Reply: John Sefton: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:52:42 -0600
Sam Wormley wrote:
> No Center
> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
No center is a cop-out.
That's when they decided that only the
singularity counts.
What this means is that there is nothing outside of it.
But, then, what is it expanding into and how can you judge
how fast?
Logically, expansion makes no sense,
because there isn't anything to expand into.
Cop-out.
One of the first obvious failures before DM.
John
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Next in thread: John Sefton: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Reply: John Sefton: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|