Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?

From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 03/02/05 

Date: 1 Mar 2005 17:20:58 -0800

Franz Heymann wrote:
> "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
> news:1109679825.893876.17420@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> > Well ain't that pretty.
> > Franz with the blessing of Bjeorn and Crieghton
> > have decided a rotating electostatic dipole
> > radiates just like a rotating bar magnetic.
>
> With E,D and H,B interchanged, and the occasional c stuffed in to
> retain dimensional homogeneity.
>
> > Well that old theory about the ground state of
> > da Hydrogen atom not radiating, you know, details
> > like that pesky Quantum Theory, aren't needed
> > acording to the 3 wise men. They've pronounced
> > otherwise.
>
> At the moment we are talking classical physics, just in case your
> meagre intellect has failed to notice it.

Oh, Franz made a new rule, no knowledge past
1900 allowed, no SR, GR or QT.

> > They say rotating dipoles radiate no matter what.
>
> Yes.
>
> > So far the've managed to eliminate Maxwell's EM,
> > SR, GR and QT,
>
> No.
>
> > damn my TEEVEE just blinked off,
> > they must be right.
>
> They were and are.
>
> > You'all better stop shaving
> > and wrap a towel around you head to fit in.
> > Me thinks JM may be absorbed by "the body".
>
> Tucker, everybody on the ng already knows you are a moron, so stop
> bragging about it.

Better More On than More OFF.

Franz, you have no current or current density "J"
in Maxwell's phraseology to create the "displacement
current" &E/&t, in an isolated bar magnet.

Furthermore QT and GR also predict no radiation.
Ken
PS: this is getting boring and circular.

Relevant Pages