Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!
From: Fred J. McCall (fmccall_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: What it takes to be a revolutionary thinker"
- Previous message: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com: "Grecian Urns and all that (Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science)"
- In reply to: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:09:01 GMT
"Ian St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> wrote:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:> "Ian St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> wrote:
:>
:>> Fred J. McCall wrote:
:>>> lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
:>>>
:>>>> I find lying and misrepresentation of facts morally reprehensive,
:>>>
:>>> Yet you are one of the people who seems to engage most heavily in
:>>> those activities.
:>>
:>> Gee. Another misrepresentation of facts by Fred. When WILL he learn
:>> not to do that?
:>
:> Gee, coming from a Canadian posting while claiming a .usa domain, I'm
:
:I do not claim to be a Canadian, nor an American, nor a dual citizen, nor
:claimed to have a valid email addy.
And no one claimed you ever claimed to be a Canadian, nor an American,
nor a dual citizen, nor to have a valid email addy.
:Still misrepresenting facts and making
:it up at a record clip, are you?
Statements of fact, unfortunately for you, Ian.
:The usenet is not a place to impose
:patriotism ( as in a membership in a 'club' with rules on what you can say
:regardless of the facts ) as a way to stiffle open debate.
It certainly goes to your honesty that you (through your email
address) represent yourself as being American while posting through a
Canadian ISP, don't you think?
:> sure everyone will give you all the credence you deserve.
:
:My credence comes from the fact that I never lie.
You also never seem to tell the truth. The only conclusion one can
draw is that you simply don't know the difference.
:P.S. my return setting is
:"noemail.usa".
Which is irrelevant. It would still be a .usa domain. You DO know
how to read those things, don't you?
:You left off the 'noemail' in your lie about my return
:address domain.
You mean my true statement about your return address domain, don't
you?
:Or do you think that there is a domain in the U.S. called
:"noemail"??
Do you think there is a domain with users in it that is ONLY the
top-level domain '.usa'?
There are actually a number of subdomains in the U.S. called
'noemail', in point of fact. There just doesn't happen to currently
be one in the '.usa' domain.
There is 'noemail.com' in Delaware, 'noemail.info' in Texas,
'noemail.net' in New Jersey, and 'noemail.org' in Paris (the one in
France, not the one in Texas). What would be so unusual about a full
domain name of 'noemail.usa', given all of those, Ian?
However, you're right. I knew it was fake because I know you're a
liar.
:You, on the other hand, have no credibiltiy because anyone can see that you
:make claims that are NOT supported by the facts.
I'll leave that to others to decide. So far, you're coming off like
the liar that you are.
:I have to assume that you tried to send me a private email.
Why do you have to assume that? Who is forcing you to? You certainly
have my permission not to.
It may indeed be true that you assume that, but that's only because
you're stupid. Of course, the fact that most sane people couldn't be
bothered to send you email should probably enter into your calculation
at some point, where you will realize that I can't imagine having
anything to say to you via email.
Hell, Ian, you're just another loon I throw spit wads at occasionally.
Why would I send you email?
:I do not give
:idiots like yourself the power to spam my mailbox for obvious reasons.
Why would anyone bother?
:Telling the truth these days is a risk
And it is obviously a risk you don't have the guts to take, which
explains the spate of half-truths and lies you usually post.
:and it route the mail so that nobody
:can easily apply the usual fascist harassment techniques. My email box is
:nicely devoid of threatening letters, calls on patriotism to support the
:President ( despite the fact that he is betraying the country ) and other
:forms of public intimidation.
Why would anyone call on the patriotism of a Canadian to support the
US President?
Again, you're just another example of the well known Usenet species of
Northern Loon.
:> Ian's the other major liar in the neighborhood besides Lloyd. The way
:> you and Lloyd switch off, one has to wonder....
:
:That would be fine if you just had a brain to use for this speculation. So
:far, you are batting zero on all counts.
Sure. Whatever you need to think to prop up your pathetic little ego,
Ian. Don't look now, but I think your beanie needs more foil in it,
what with the increase in cranial size that goes with your own
evaluation of your importance in the scheme of things.
If you mattered, Ian, it wouldn't be that hard to find you. You're
simply not bright enough to hide effectively. Just be thankful you're
merely another irrelevant piss ant, since, as you note above, you
don't even have the courage to even consider telling the truth, much
less doing anything that would actually make you matter to anyone.
-- You are What you do When it counts.
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: What it takes to be a revolutionary thinker"
- Previous message: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com: "Grecian Urns and all that (Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science)"
- In reply to: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|