Re: Einstein was Precisely Backward, Deliberately

From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 03/20/05 

Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:20:44 -0800

Robert Grace wrote:
 
> None dare answer the questions.

Both Newton and Einstein are parity-even mathematics (tensors in the
latter case). Inverting all coordinates changes nothing.
Weitzenboeck's affine gravitation contains all GR predictions
qualitatively and quantitively, but employs pseudotensors that are
parity-dependent. Affine gravitation does not require the Equivalence
Principle.

Yer stooopid and boring. If there exists not a single empirical
falsification, the theory remains validated. Idiot.

<http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html>
 Mathematics of gravitation

<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-4/index.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
<http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/physics/experiments.html>
 Experimental constraints on General Relativity

http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
<http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjjacob/Lecture16.pdf>
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/index.html>
 Relativity in the GPS system (weak field)

Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-5/index.html>
<http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1473_1.asp>
 Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries (strong field) 

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Relevant Pages