Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs

From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/20/05 

Date: 19 Mar 2005 18:47:29 -0800

Sorry 'bz', this is my third freaking effort at getting them pesky
words and my dyslexic Klingon syntax half-ass correct.

"bz; A rock sitting on the surface of the moon 'sees'a hemisphere of
space.
Energy radiates from the rock into all the space it 'sees'.

It receives energy from the sun. A small amount from the earth. The
rocks
around it are at the same temperature as it is at. They reduce the sky
it
sees, but as they are at the same temperature, they don't heat it."

Is this another one of your trick question/answers?

Apparently within your conditional laws of AI/moon rock physics, said
AI/moon rocks somehow manage to not radiate their IR energy towards any
other rock or moonsuit.

OK, at least that's telling me a little something of which side you're
on.

"bz; Include everything in your calculations. YOU are forgetting that
the 'sky' is verrrrry cold."

The supposed sky above the moon is not only pitch black and certainly
far better than crystal clear (especially to whatever's near-UV and
UV/a), it's also verrrrry much a damn vacuum, thus cold, hot whatever
doesn't mean squat. There's nearly zero conduction mode of thermal
energy in such a near vacuum (near vacuum = near ideal insulation, as
in R-1024/mm or better).

"bz; Without the sun shining on those rocks, or your space suit, the
heat radiates into intergalactic space rather rapidly."

Whatever mass/m3 or per cm3 is what counts, then somewhat dependent
upon the color or spectrum of whatever's radiating said thermal energy
gets involved. At 3+t/m3, it seems the mass of whatever's moon is going
to transpire as you've stipulated. However, if your moonsuited *** is
situated somewhere between said hot-rocks that are surrounding yourself
and thereby your are in fact situated between them hot-rocks emitting
IR photons in every conceivable which way but lose out into the near
vacuum of space, as well as a portion that's migrating downward into
the moon itself, whereas I guess that I'm still wondering what's going
to transpire on behalf of said toasty moonsuit *** that's already
taking on the raw solar influx of whatever's not being effectively
reflected by the moonsuit. Obviously another dark basalt rock not
wearing it's moonsuit is going to get it's exposed *** somewhat hotter
than not (certainly isn't going to become colder)

"bz; When you dig down a little, it is very cold."

I've seen absolutely nothing but the usual NASA/Apollo ruse of
disinformation-R-us, and/or their subjective scientific speculations as
to whatever's what. Otherwise, where's your independent hard-science
upon that portion of physics crapolla?

You do realize that the moon has a rather toasty core of some odd
800+°C to work with?

Thanks for the office invite, and I hope your PC disinfection goes
well. It's probably that I'm just not smart enough to bust myself out
of a paper bag, much less get a grip on whatever's taking my PC to it's
knees (even shutting it down by way of causing a reset).

There's a perfectly good chance that 'WormRadar' simply didn't load
properly, as it's asking for a missing file each time it starts. Right
now it's offline because it hasn't resolved all that much that I can
tell.

BTW; not that it matters but, within my spare dyslexic time I've
slightly polished my external 'gv-topics' page.

Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator):
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Other available topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm