Re: COSA.....

From: George Hammond (nowhere1_at_nospam.net)
Date: 03/20/05 

Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:10:00 GMT

"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:JeudnVkF0uRT5KHfRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > [Hammond]
> > That's what a high school dropout like YOU wants to think.
> > THEY know better. Prof Chris Isham world famous
> > gravity physicist, Steve Unwin PhD gravity physics,
> > and Prof. Bill Dembski (7 college degrees) ALL
> > KNOW BETTER than to try and challenge me,
> > they've already tried and failed pathetically, see:
> >
> > http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Isdemunwin.html
>
> They saw, they read, they laughed, and then they mocked.

[Hammond]
Baloney.... Isham doesn't know *** from Shinola about either
Psychometry or Theology (despite being elected head of the
Science-religion forum)... and despite being a world renowned
gravity physicist.
  He made such unrealistic statements I practically had to gasp
that any qualified physicist would even mouth such words...
such as this absolute gem:

[Prof. Chris Isham wrote 12-15-03]
            "If I understand you correctly, you
            are invoking quantum gravity as a
            way of producing large gravitational
            fields inside the brain"

to which I was forced to point out that:

[Hammond reply 12-16-03]
Such a proposal would be of course ridiculous.
No where in my work is any such thing posited.
As anyone knows the gravitational field inside the
brain is no different that the field inside a
grapefruit. If it weren't it could be measured
with ordinary laboratory equipment and would have
been noticed years ago. This bizzare misconception
of yours renders the entire contents of you email
letter irrelevant.

I was floored that a prominent gravity physicist would
even mouth such a statement for chrissakes... he must
be a kook!

He was so busy worrying about family problems,
school schedules and busy work galore that he
NEVER DID recognize the fact that the "curvature
of God" was in "subjectively seen" spacetime and not
actual real physical spacetime,.. which of course
is the "curvature of Gravity" as distinguised from
the "curvature of God".
(albeit, the latter causes the former "virtually").

THE GUY DOESN'T HAVE A CLUE
as to what the theory is about... and could
care LESS apparently.... he, like you, is
only interested in the matter as a potential
"kookbashing exercise" which, like you,
appears to be one of his pastimes.
OBVIOUSLY, this time he barked up the
wrong tree and wound up with egg on his beard.
I broke off the discussion after that, and
doubt I'll ever talk to him privately again.
Doubt I'll ever talk to ANYONE from academia
privately again. If they want to talk to me
they'll have to do it publicly... like you do.
====================================
   SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
   mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to COSAchurch@hotmail.com
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
====================================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===================================

Quantcast