Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!
From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 03/21/05
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- In reply to: John Sefton: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:37:45 +0100
John Sefton wrote:
[snip]
> "A few mm across."
> Compared to what, Sam?
Sorry, but what on earth is your problem? Asking "compared
to what" after the size is given as "a few mm across" makes
no sense at all!
If someone tells you that his height is 1.8 m, do you also
ask him "compared to what"???
> If there *is* nothing (in its purest form)
> outside of the s***-ularity,
Err, we are talking about a time *after* the BB here, so there
is no singularity anymore.
[snip rant]
Bye,
Bjoern
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- In reply to: John Sefton: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Next in thread: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Whats wrong with the theory... The horizon problem!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]