Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science

From: Giuseppe Bilotta (bilotta78_at_hotpop.com)
Date: 03/21/05 

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:50:41 +0100

Lester Zick wrote:
> Unfortunately I know the modern mathematikers answer to this, Albert.:
> Infinity is the equality between sets and their subsets. Which is only
> possible when sets and subsets are undefined to begin with. Go figure.

What is your definition of "undefined"? 

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and cents
Pounds shillings and pence
                  (Roger Waters)

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... > Unfortunately I know the modern mathematikers answer to this, Albert.: ... > Infinity is the equality between sets and their subsets. ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... > Unfortunately I know the modern mathematikers answer to this, Albert.: ... > Infinity is the equality between sets and their subsets. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: X/0 DEFINED
    ... as generally useful in mathematics, for reasons you are probably somewhat ... > multiplicative identity principle of zero is to remain true that 0 x ... > Infinity has a comlex meaning, with at least two separate underlying ... What you have done is break transitivity of equality, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: maximum interval of the existence
    ... problem has a unique solution x. ... By Gronwall's equality, ... maximal interval of existence is (-infinity, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... >> that there are details of infinity that it does not capture. ... just because there is the same Cantorian cardinality. ... > Can a valid bijection be invented between the set of reals ... Yes, Albert, this is where it gets funny. ...
    (sci.math)