Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:26:51 -0500
Allan C Cybulskie wrote:
>
> You cannot take "relative number" out of the phrase "relative number of
> elements". What the phrase means as a whole is the number of elements in
> the sets relative to each other's number of elements, even if the exact
> number of elements is not known/knowable (ie that whatever the number of
> elements in the one set is, the other set has a constant number relative to
> that).
What does the phrase "relative to each other's number of elements" mean?
Bob Kolker
>
>
>
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|