Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: ring_theory: "Re: Railgun Research: Barrrel Design or Power Supply"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:37:06 -0500
There are no rocks in this image.
Thats charged dust clumps .
This is th only image of the moon.
its about 100 feet befor impact.
Its falling slow 1000 fpm.
remember the roswll balloon..
that was a drop balloon .
too thin to wad up.
Evyone knew argon at 0 psi held down by gravity would slow it dwn but
no one knew the dust was 40 feet thick.
The dust is too light at 1/6 G to pack down to walk on.
It may not have sunk in the dust ,, te charged dust my have jumped at
it and covered up and gone .
where are all the great probe images ???
luna9close.gif
Address:http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/luna9close.gif
Changed:12:24 PM on Wednesday, October 5, 1994
This is it
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: ring_theory: "Re: Railgun Research: Barrrel Design or Power Supply"
- In reply to: tj Frazir: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|