Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic
From: OsherD (mdoctorow_at_comcast.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Electromagnetic waves"
- In reply to: bz: "Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic"
- Next in thread: bz: "Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic"
- Reply: bz: "Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Mar 2005 19:47:55 -0800
>>From Osher Doctorow
bz said:
>Your posts went through. I am not sure what >was strange about my
post,
>however. Could you clarify?
Thanks. I knew about messages arriving in different orders, but
several of my messages didn't go through, including the one where I
replied positively to yours. You're forgetting that posters,
regardless of whether they use one method such as Google Beta (mine) or
not, do usually obtain consistent indications that their posts have
gone through and that mine only were restored when I contact "help" at
Google Beta. If posters didn't get consistent indication that their
posts have gone through, do you think that anybody would keep posting?
By the way, I very much agree about the set of things that we don't
know being an infinite set. I think that in referring to one of your
posts as strange, I may have been reading the citation of your post by
another reader because at several points there were unclear separations
between messages.
Best Regards,
Osher
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Electromagnetic waves"
- In reply to: bz: "Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic"
- Next in thread: bz: "Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic"
- Reply: bz: "Re: TOE Via Cantor's Transfinite Arithmetic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|