Re: Zap Them Babies Dead - Vets too

From: Rob Duncan (robduncan_at_gbronline.com)
Date: 03/22/05 

Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 05:47:13 -0800

"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3aak9aF64o1eiU1@individual.net...
>
>
> Rob Duncan wrote:
>>testified under oath.
>>
>>
>> The claim is she made an off-hand remark at a funeral.
>
> In the absence of a living will the testimony stands. So saith the probate
> court and so agreeth all the apeals courts. There is no doubt that a
> notarized or witnessed living will wouuld have forstalled all this crap or
> maybe not. If Terri had written this down her parents would still try to
> have their way. They are grief stricken parents and fanatic Catholics
>
>>
>>
>>>But get back to the legal issues.
>>>
>>>1. Did Terri get due process? Yes. Double and re-doubled in spades. Here
>>>case has gone up and down the court system in Florida like an elevator.
>>>Even the Supreme Court of the United States found no reason to intervene.
>>
>>
>> Because they havent any authority in the matter.
>
> They do and the Feds are going to make this quite clear.
>>
>>
>> Dont care about the legal issues. I dont feel the feds have any business
>
> You are thinking with your intestines, not your brains. The matter must be
> decided legally and not emotionally. You are pissed off because you are
> not seeing the outcome you want to see. In a legal system when losers have
> lost their last appeal they must accept the decision as Law. Otherwise we
> have anarchy. Is that what you really want?

What are you? Some weird type of idiot? Pissed off? Give me a break.
This is simply a matter of discussion. How old are you? Because I could
care less what the feds believe or pronounce, "Im thinking with my
intestines, and not my brains?" From where do you come up with this ***?

>> telling the states what to do. All they did was make it so the appeals
>> could be made in fed court. If I understand correctly.
>
> Read the tenth amemdment to the Constitution sometimes. Federalism and
> State's Powers are not quite dead yet.

What was the point of that blather?

> It is clear you have no concept of how powers are to be devided under our
> system of government. The Founders never intended Congress to have power
> overall aspect of the lives of the citizens. State government has that
> burden and even they are constrained by the various bills of rights that
> exist in the State constitutions.
>
> Bob Kolker

No ***? Holy fucking cow, the moron finally realized it! After reading
what I wrote you then lamely attempt to now argue I dont understand the
constitution, and think the feds have control over what states do? I
suggest rereading what I wrote. Your confused blather is making no sense.
I cant even address all your misconceptions... as its a waste of my time.

Rob

Quantcast