Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5
From: Dan Bloomquist (public21_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 03/02/05
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Previous message: Dave P.: "Re: black holes and intelligent design"
- In reply to: edddy: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- Next in thread: edddy: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- Reply: edddy: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 05:32:01 GMT
edddy wrote:
> Basiscally, the atom to be fissioned is to be relative!
Are you looking to take up Archimedes Plutonium's slack?
Best, Dan.
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Previous message: Dave P.: "Re: black holes and intelligent design"
- In reply to: edddy: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- Next in thread: edddy: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- Reply: edddy: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|