Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control
From: OsherD (mdoctorow_at_comcast.net)
Date: 03/02/05
- Next message: Dave P.: "Re: black holes and intelligent design"
- Previous message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- In reply to: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Next in thread: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Reply: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Mar 2005 21:35:10 -0800
>>From Osher Doctorow
I should mention that lambda is the vacuum energy density.
There are some rather interesting things to keep in mind:
A. The Anti-Evaporation (expansion) isn't caused by the Weyl tensor but
by the
BraneWorld (BW) correction to the matter-stress tensor.
B. The Evaporation is caused by the Weyl tensor as the quantum
back-reaction on the brane metric. The brane metric is taken to be the
Tolman geometric metric
with equation (21) of their paper.
I'll hopefully come back to this later.
Osher
- Next message: Dave P.: "Re: black holes and intelligent design"
- Previous message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5"
- In reply to: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Next in thread: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Reply: OsherD: "Re: Black Hole Bouncing vs Evaporation vs Control"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|