Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert Wagner (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: bz: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: A chat with Rodney Cox"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:46:38 -0600
robert j. kolker wrote:
>
>
> Lester Zick wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Nice, Albert. Wish I'd said it.
>
>
> Torkel is dissing you guys and you finally have caught on. Torkel is the
> UseNet guardian demon of things logical. Woe, woe unto anyone who sayeth
> that which is incorrect about logic and related matters.
ROTFLMAO.
-- "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." - -- Tolstoy
- Next message: bz: "Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: A chat with Rodney Cox"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|