Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert Wagner (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: tsunami: i propose help"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Is time simply a measurement of gravity net force ?"
- In reply to: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Dave Rusin: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Dave Rusin: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:10:59 -0600
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> Albert Wagner wrote:
>
>>I consider infinity to be undefined and undefinable.
>
>
> Or, translated in English "I consider apples to be oranges and
> pears."
Nope. Not a proper translation. Is English your second language?
> Enough of this blabbering.
Yes, indeed. I cannot get a mathematiker to define 'infinity' in
such a way that mathematical operations can be performed upon it.
-- "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." - -- Tolstoy
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: tsunami: i propose help"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Is time simply a measurement of gravity net force ?"
- In reply to: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Dave Rusin: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Dave Rusin: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading