Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?
From: FrediFizzx (fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/02/05
- Next message: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: GOD=G_uv"
- Previous message: Kazmer Ujvarosy: "Re: Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:28:01 -0800
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:1109726458.585236.37130@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Franz Heymann wrote:
| > "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
| > news:1109679825.893876.17420@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| [...]
| > > Well ain't that pretty.
| > > Franz with the blessing of Bjeorn and Crieghton
| > > have decided a rotating electostatic dipole
| > > radiates just like a rotating bar magnetic.
| >
| > With E,D and H,B interchanged, and the occasional c stuffed in to
| > retain dimensional homogeneity.
| >
| > > Well that old theory about the ground state of
| > > da Hydrogen atom not radiating, you know, details
| > > like that pesky Quantum Theory, aren't needed
| > > acording to the 3 wise men. They've pronounced
| > > otherwise.
| >
| > At the moment we are talking classical physics, just in case your
| > meagre intellect has failed to notice it.
|
| Oh, Franz made a new rule, no knowledge past
| 1900 allowed, no SR, GR or QT.
|
| > > They say rotating dipoles radiate no matter what.
| >
| > Yes.
| >
| > > So far the've managed to eliminate Maxwell's EM,
| > > SR, GR and QT,
| >
| > No.
| >
| > > damn my TEEVEE just blinked off,
| > > they must be right.
| >
| > They were and are.
| >
| > > You'all better stop shaving
| > > and wrap a towel around you head to fit in.
| > > Me thinks JM may be absorbed by "the body".
| >
| > Tucker, everybody on the ng already knows you are a moron, so stop
| > bragging about it.
|
| Better More On than More OFF.
|
| Franz, you have no current or current density "J"
| in Maxwell's phraseology to create the "displacement
| current" &E/&t, in an isolated bar magnet.
A magnet has bound current density. J_b = curl M. See Griffiths, "Intro.
to Electrodynamics" 3rd ed. page 268. ;-)
FrediFizzx
- Next message: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: GOD=G_uv"
- Previous message: Kazmer Ujvarosy: "Re: Superluminal deBroglie Pilot Waves & Magnetoelectrism"
- In reply to: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Reply: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|