Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Fastest Time"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Next in thread: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Reply: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:00:18 -0800
Mark Martin wrote:
>
> Al wrote:
> > http://www.bnl.gov/RHIC/black_holes.htm
>
> "...the rapid deceleration of RHIC ions as they smash into each other
> for a very short period of time (about 10^(-23) second) is similar to
> the extreme gravitational environment in the vicinity of a black hole.
> This means that RHIC collisions should emit a bunch of thermal
> particles similar to the "Hawking radiation" emitted by a black
> hole."
>
> That's a truly deep insight. In this sense alone the experiment is also
> a test of the equivalence principle, of general relativity, under
> extreme conditions.
How do you figure that? If the EP were violated by 10% or it were
not, what difference would it make in the cited example? If GR were
incorrect by 10% or it were not, what difference would it make in the
cited example?
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Fastest Time"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Next in thread: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Reply: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|