Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report
From: Lady Chatterly (not-bot_at_catcher.in.the.rye)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: 2ndPostulateDude: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- Previous message: Quantum Mirror: "Re: Solar Cell Efficiency"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:46:47 GMT
In article <1111594253.740601.91120@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Mark Martin <qed100@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>To be more clear, the specific experimental run may or may not have the
>precision to do so. I was more in the mindset of suddenly being shown
>something that was dangling in front of me all this time, that high
>energy accelerators may, at least in principle, be used to create
>extreme "gravitational" conditions. It's cool.
Enjoy that beautiful new house.
>-Mark Martin
Nescio de quo loqueris.
-- Lady Chatterly "You haven't passed the Turing test. I'll ask the questions around here until you do." -- AbsolutelyCertain
- Next message: 2ndPostulateDude: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- Previous message: Quantum Mirror: "Re: Solar Cell Efficiency"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Brookhaven Responds to black hole report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
