Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Allan C Cybulskie (allan.c.cybulskie_at_yahoo.ca)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Does "c" loose some velocity after leaving a dense medium back into space?"
- Previous message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Baby talk and prejudices about absolute time and determinism"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:58:07 -0500
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3ae8a1F65rabgU3@individual.net...
>
>
> Allan C Cybulskie wrote:
>
> >
> > These are all the things we have to figure out by examining inner
> > experience -- the best we can.
> >
> > You commented in another post that you wanted to re-read Kant. Looking
at
> > his philosophy of mind might really help you.
>
> Kant was very bright and Very Wrong. There is no such thing as a
> synthetic a priori judgement. All synthetic judgements are a posteriori.
> He was dead wrong about Euclidean Geomtry which he consider apodactic
> being based on necessary synthetic a priori judgements. The existence of
> non-Euclidean geometry indicates Kant was mistaken.
And this relates to his philosophy of mind ... how, precisely?
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Does "c" loose some velocity after leaving a dense medium back into space?"
- Previous message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Baby talk and prejudices about absolute time and determinism"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
