Einstain was Precisely Backward, Deliberately

From: Robert Grace (rgrace_at_aemail4u-dot-com.no-spam.invalid)
Date: 03/24/05 

Date: 23 Mar 2005 19:37:44 -0600

PDraper takes a brave stab at the solution and ends up saying the same
thing as Einstain taught and all of the science monkeys mimic.

Examples from his post:

My Quote:
Chicken-shits trying to turn the tide.

My Quote: The point is, you still fail to comprehend that chirality
and parity have nothing to do with the deliberate back-assward
physics you are used to spouting, nor with correct physics. So
disprove my chirality
statements all you like.
 

Draper: And we'll go on to prove others of your misstatements as well,
if you'd like.

My Quote:
You are so scared you dare not answer any questions. I dont believe
you simply cannot comprehend what Im saying.. Are you friggin deaf or

completely stupid?

My Quote: Cant even tell me what gravity is.
 

Draper: Let's start here. How about: Gravity is the observed deviation
of behavior of from flat-space motion due to the presence of mass.
This is completely accountable by the distortion of space in the
region of mass.

Now you tell me how you know empirically that this is not so.

My Quote:
Cant even tell me why earth twists space.
 
Because it is massive.

My Quote:
Cant even tell me why earth precesses space.
 
Because it is massive.

My Quote:
Cant even tell me why mass is superior to space.
 

Umm... It isn't. Who says it is?

*****************************************************

PDraper claims to have proof that the paper he produced, concerning
chirality of Thalidomide, is a factual paper. Everyone knows the
source of that paper and how many lies have been told to keep science
functioning for them. In short, no one can really prove anything.

Draper bravely ventures: Let's start here. How about: Gravity is the
observed deviation of behavior of from flat-space motion due to the
presence of mass. This is completely accountable by the distortion of
space in the region of mass.

Now you tell me how you know empirically that this is not so.

My Answer: "Due to the presence of mass" he says. Any time you see
mass forwarded as the controlling mechanism of space, you can be sure
it is false. Why? If you had a clue, you would realize there is no
such thing as matter and mass is what energy has....namely even
Scientific American says that "energy has mass". So Reality is space
and what it is doing. I'll show you what it is doing in the next
questions. That is as empherical as it gets. There is no proof for
anything on either side, people. Never has been. If we had to offer
proof, we wouldnt be in the quagmire we are in today.

My Quote:
Cant even tell me why earth twists space.
 
PDraper: Because it is massive.

My Answer: Nope. Einstain taught you backward. I have a saying.
"Imagine you are at a funeral and someone proclaims that the dead
body in the coffin is in control of the people at the funeral." You
would laugh it to scorn. Matter is not in control of space, it is
space vortexes that collect matter trash in the centers. And spatial
energy has mass, not mass has energy. See? Reality is opposite
Einstain, and you monkeys. If space were not vortexing at the
velocity of space, mind you, not the velocity of light, there would
be no matter at all.

My Quote:
Cant even tell me why earth precesses space.
 
PDraper: Because it is massive.

My Answer: You see, these were trick questions. Earth has no ability
at all to precess space, twist space or warp space. What you say?

It is space that is already vortexing in huge spirals and the tighter
the spiral the more "force" and "energy" is measured. However, if
Gravity Probe - B scientists proclaim that earth is somehow in
control of perfect, flat-space, as you say, then they have, again,
made the same backward mistake that Einstain and you monkeys make.
But science will say that, agreeing perfectly with Einstain's
backward hypotheses. How can this be, you ask? You see, maths can
"prove" anything you like. Also, if science realized that they could
not measure space, there was no more need of you. So all of science
manipulated Reality just as Einstain recommended,

"we should not speak of things that can't be measured."

And even when it dawns on you that you have turned all of Reality on
its head, you will still insist that you are correct because you must
measure things and if you cannot measure space, you will never accept
the idea, deliberately.

In short, even after comprehending, you sacrifice Reality and truth
for your self-interests.

My Quote:
Cant even tell me why mass is superior to space.
 
Umm... It isn't. Who says it is?

My Answer: You almost got confused over this one didnt you. Well it,
also, is a trick question. Mass has never been superior to space,
ever. There is no proof either way. I just realized it is so. But
knowledge is power and we now have power over the errors of you and
Einstain.

Robert Grace
rgrace@aemail4u.com

PS. Now that you others have waitied and gleaned a little information
as to what your nemisis is, you may now attempt to explain why you
cant answer the 8 questions, so that a child can understand you.

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
                http://www.usenet.com

Quantcast